One of the first things new subscribers ask is whether they can run multiple strategies at the same time. The answer is no, and the reason is not a technical limitation. It is a deliberate design choice.
Risk has to stay legible
When a trader runs three strategies at once, the questions that matter become hard to answer. What is your actual exposure right now? Which strategy is responsible for which open P&L? Which one is the reason you are halfway to your daily loss limit? If an edge is fading, which one is it?
On paper those questions have answers. In a bad drawdown they do not, because nobody is sitting at the desk doing the attribution math while the tape is moving. People size up when they are confident, and they lose track when they are stressed. A multi-strategy stack concentrates both effects.
Selection is a trade
Picking a strategy is itself a decision with a cost. If we let subscribers hedge that decision by running everything at once, we turn the product into a dashboard of noise. You stop having a thesis and start having a portfolio of overlapping bets you did not think through.
Forcing a single choice per subscription means that when you pick, you thought about it. You can still hold several subscriptions if you want diversification. The cost is visible rather than hidden.
The 24-hour cooldown exists for the same reason
When you swap strategies, a 24-hour cooldown starts before you can activate a different one. This is not a subscription trick. It is a forced cool-off so you do not chase a losing strategy into a winning one out of frustration. Chasing is what kills retail accounts, not the strategies themselves.
When we will relax this
We will relax the single-strategy rule when we can attribute P&L cleanly to each strategy in real time, expose it on the dashboard, and build a risk overlay that caps aggregate exposure across strategies. Until then, one strategy, one subscription. It is the honest default.